Aleck Greenham
Aleck Greenham
Ok, thanks for the consideration. If it helps, the way we are currently achieving the desired result in our custom handlers is to recursively delete matching ids from each attributes...
Hi @Marahin, Did you get a chance to think about this? Thanks.
Sure. It may be a while before I get one together, though.
This is fantastic news, @nikajukic. @Marahin is there any chance of getting that pull request reviewed, merged and released any time soon? There's definitely still an appetite for it, on...
Thanks @Marahin, that's much appreciated. For what it's worth, I've taken a look over @nikajukic's PR and tried to provide some (hopefully) useful suggestions, to help keep this alive.
I'm happy with any of the possibilities you've outlined. The minimal set of changes appears to be changing from `cid_` to `lid_` (with it being part of the draft standard,...
Actually, we have some legacy clients for which the breaking change of moving from `cid_` to `lid_` would present a problem. Retaining the ability to specify an alternative prefix would...
> Regarding the lambda, I'm not sure if it's needed here. I think having the prefix config option is good enough, but if you insist, we could add a lambda...
@nikajukic have there been any updates on this since last month?
@choosen this is a very good point and a distinction that was somehow missed (did the proposal _change_, or was I just not attentive enough the first time?) I would...