Consider building one binary instead of two

[grdl]

Right now git-get relases two binaries: git-get and git-list. Consider building only a single git-get binary and embed the list functionality into it (eg, git get list or git get --list).

It was suggested by the creator of git-bug based on disuccions about his project on git mailing list (link to the thread).

Releasing only a single binary would reduce the "namespace grabbing" and may make more sense semantically since git list refers to repos managed by git get anyway.

[madeddie]

and for purposes of having git automagically use these for subcommands you could also check what the binary is called as. if called as git-get, act as git-get, if called as git-list, act as git-list, like busybox. Then you can have binary git-get (the name of the of the project) and symlink git-list -> git-get