Gilles Querret

Rule will report INTEGER(enumRef), but not INT64(enumRef). That will be re-evaluated when the `?:` notation is available. @PeterJudge-PSC Is that planned for 12.5 ? Or later ? I think reporting...

I agree that having the INPUT-OUTPUT or OUTPUT always present would help in terms of readability. But having two methods with the same name and same signature except for INPUT-OUTPUT...

Can be done, but probably with a minor severity, as the only impact is a few more bytes in the rcode, and code less readable (but nothing really bad). Unless...

Do you have a short code example which reproduces the problem. The KB entry doesn't provide one.

Yes, please create a small example so that the rule could be documented. Based on the info in the KB I wasn't able to create one myself.

Seems to be a perfect example. Adding `define buffer btt for tt` makes the `can-find` return true. @movedoa Do you confirm it was this kind of problem?

I probably mixed things up this morning, as I can't reproduce anymore (I also tried to verify earlier the behavior with DB tables). Defining the local buffer doesn't help, I'll...

After the post on communities, I remembered that CAN-FIND in fact uses another buffer name. So I don't think scanning for default buffer usage on TT will really help. What...

@movedoa Yes, there can still be a rule for default buffer usage on TT. It's just the explanation doesn't specifically relates to the initial KB entry.

> Is there a rule to flag dot-comments? https://sonar.riverside-software.fr/coding_rules?languages=oe&open=rssw-oe-main%3Aeu.rssw.antlr.proparse.checks.DotComment&q=dot