gpt-engineer
gpt-engineer copied to clipboard
gpt-engineer-org
Suggestion - Enabling GPT Engineers to Work with Local Models
Issue Template: Suggestion - Enabling GPT Engineers to Work with Local Models
Description: Currently, GPT engineers primarily work with cloud-based models for text generation tasks. This suggestion aims to enable GPT engineers to work with local models, providing them with the flexibility and control to run and experiment with models on their own machines or infrastructure.
Current Situation: At present, GPT engineers heavily rely on cloud-based services or APIs to access and utilize pre-trained language models for their tasks. This dependence on external services limits their ability to work offline, control the infrastructure, or experiment with different model configurations.
Suggested Solution: The suggested solution is to develop and support a framework or toolset that allows GPT engineers to work with local models. This could involve providing pre-trained model files that can be easily downloaded and integrated into the engineers' own development environments. The toolset should offer compatibility with popular programming languages and frameworks commonly used by GPT engineers.
Benefits and Use Cases:
- Offline Work: Enabling GPT engineers to work with local models allows them to perform text generation tasks without relying on an internet connection or cloud infrastructure. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where internet access is limited or unreliable.
- Increased Control: Local models empower GPT engineers to have full control over the infrastructure and environment in which the models are deployed. They can fine-tune performance, optimize resource utilization, and customize the model's behavior according to their specific requirements.
- Enhanced Privacy and Security: Working with local models helps address privacy and security concerns by eliminating the need to transmit sensitive data to external cloud services.
- Experimentation and Research: GPT engineers can freely experiment with different model architectures, configurations, and modifications without being constrained by the limitations or restrictions imposed by cloud-based platforms. This flexibility fosters innovation and advances in the field of text generation.
Additional Information:
- Consider providing comprehensive documentation and tutorials to guide GPT engineers in setting up and using local models effectively.
- Explore the possibility of incorporating model versioning and update mechanisms to ensure compatibility and allow seamless transitions between different versions of the models.
Related Links/References:
- https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui
GPT-4 behaves a known way and so does the OpenAI API, with open source models the prompt format can change from model to model, additionally most models aren't even nearly capable of coding coherent codebases just simply due to context limit, even if they manage a single file coherently, something to note is the LocalAI repo, which is essentially an open source reproduction of OpenAI's api endpoints but which uses local models.
GPT-4 behaves a known way and so does the OpenAI API, with open source models the prompt format can change from model to model, additionally most models aren't even nearly capable of coding coherent codebases just simply due to context limit, even if they manage a single file coherently, something to note is the LocalAI repo, which is essentially an open source reproduction of OpenAI's api endpoints but which uses local models.
There have been regular developments to run the models locally on the machine, ofc the support to run LocalAI repo on local machine might not be a bad idea for this project.
GPT-4 behaves a known way and so does the OpenAI API, with open source models the prompt format can change from model to model, additionally most models aren't even nearly capable of coding coherent codebases just simply due to context limit, even if they manage a single file coherently, something to note is the LocalAI repo, which is essentially an open source reproduction of OpenAI's api endpoints but which uses local models.
I don't think this is a valid counter argument, as users will tend to discover the most optimal model for GPT Engineer out of the thousands available. If just one of the many models available works, then it's not really a reason not to develop a local version.
Further OpenAI is not really that open anymore, it's developing into a commercial closed entity and would the project really like to support this by making it the only option?
