GP Saggese
GP Saggese
- [ ] @gpsaggese - [ ] @tkpratardan Decision is to apply changes and merge, even if it's not complete
Yes just re-iterating to avoid confusion / frustration. 1. Apply the changes in the PR requested by the previous reviewer. In this way you can get familiar with the code...
Ok with me, but I wouldn't try to make it too perfect, since the LLM search might make human-oriented documentation less important.
I agree that having 2 flows is useful, one that runs the linter from the code (like `dev`) and one with the code hardwired (like `prod`). We should just make...
We can create a GH project `dev_system-v...: Automate GH`, since there are several things we are trying to do.
The plan sounds good. As we said the `invoke` is just to "package" / keep organized workflows.
Yes indeed. Let's add it to the conventions. This is another task that (maybe?) an LLM can perform automatically with humans to review it. My take is to have automatic...
Good stuff. 1) As always, what was not clear from the documentation? Let's update / document it 2) The tutorials (will) contain many images, since there will be one per...
I'd do `tutorial_neo4j` since @Prahar08modi and @tkpratardan are working on that so it should be working. We can push only to Docker registry and maybe GitHub when we start unit...
I would 1) Understand which steps is responsible for this 2) Check on Internet if there is a way to disable this unwanted behavior 3) If there is no way...