pythontex Merge RepSeP files

Would you be interested in merging the RepSeP PythonTeX files into PythonTeX proper?

I came to the conclusion that it's a poor design choice to track exclusively PythonTeX-related functionality in RepSeP, not least of all because it makes the distribution very weird. I could write yet another tiny package to sit in between RepSeP demo documents and PythonTeX, but that level of splitting things up will make distribution and dependency management harder for a lot of users.

Oct 10 '17 18:10 TheChymera

I would be interested in merging at least some of the functionality, especially once the new code execution core is ready. Unfortunately, I don't have time to look into merging properly at present.

Oct 13 '17 12:10 gpoore

@gpoore I have recently separated some of the RepSeP functionality into a separate package (so that it can be provided per-system and doesn't require boilerplate across all articles): https://github.com/TheChymera/repsep_utils/

Perhaps this part of RepSeP could be a good candidate for upstreaming? Btw, it's overall quite stable (well, ok, right now there's this: https://github.com/gpoore/pythontex/issues/170 but this is the exception, I swear! XD ) and serves as an excellent manuscript template in both my old and new labs.

Aug 22 '20 07:08 TheChymera

I'm still interested in improving utilities and also dependency tracking. Unfortunately, the coronavirus and other events have significantly reduced the time I can devote to PythonTeX and other projects, so it may be a while before I can work on this again.

Aug 22 '20 15:08 gpoore