Guido Petretto

Hi @rkingsbury, thanks for your comments and mentioning the maggma `FileStore`. To be honest my idea is that the `FileStore` defined here should be serving a quite different purpose compared...

To keep things going I have tried to add an implementation of the `output_files` reference. It works a bit differently compared to the standard `OutputReference` because its format should be...

Hi @FabiPi3, I am also thinking that there might some consequences to this change. To illustrate this I made an example with different objects and (de)serialization, including pydantic base models,...

Nice! I like the idea, as it allows more flexibility. On the other hand it requires a bit more work on the configuration from the user. However, the instruction for...

Thanks for bringing this up and proposing a solution. Here are some first thoughts/questions that came to mind. * The first one concerns the requirement of performing multiple queries. When...

> For your first point, that is also a potential option. However, if the first query fails, you will need to fall back on the method I proposed, leading to...

I think that making the uuid shorter and easier for copy/paste would indeed be beneficial, but I have a few notes that may be considered before proceeding: * in jobflow-remote,...

Thanks for considering these points. I have a few more comments. * There is an error in the estimate of the number of possible combinations. It is not 11^64 but...

I think that also the initial points raised by @janosh in the first message are worth considering, i.e. the ability to quickly copy/paste and having a shorter ID. uuid1 and...

I would like to point out two other smaller issues with uuid1: 1) it is not really sortable. The order needs to be reconstructed at a later time. Which is...