Graham Palmer

By the way, I've got Iceperf building and running in my [branch](https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx/compare/master...gpalmer-latai:iceoryx:iox-2221-constant-time-chunk-release?diff=unified&w=#diff-15b84b56c03730ca75bd9da16537abdbaf2d2592ff91a6eee34f267f2e4cda7d). It looks like average RTT latency went from 4.2 to 5.9. I'll try now with the FixedPositionContainer.

WIth the FixedPositionContainer I get back down to 5.5. I suspect most of the added latency is therefore from the friction I've added through the upper API layers passing around...

> Have you thought about using the FixedPositionContainer? Question about this actually - does the container still satisfy this constraint? > In order to always be able to access the...

It's too bad because the iteration properties of the FixedPositionContainer would make it a suitable choice for backwards compatibility - allowing the existing untyped API to continue releasing with the...

> I need to look closer at the FixedPositionContainer but why do you think it is not suitable? Because of this invariant the UsedChunkList needs to uphold: > In order...

> Btw, those benchmark numbers are quite high. Did you test in release mode? I don't know. I'm not sure it matters too much for comparison sake, though I could...

Hm... I don't recall what comment I made to this effect. I've actually never encountered the idea of specifying Test IDs before. I could certainly ask around but I personally...

I think what I might have said is that I'm familiar with the issue tracking process (linking issue numbers in PRs) and the github checklist and such. But specifically the...

Okay actually, I HAVE had a brief discussion about this once with a colleague, talking about some testing framework. The question was whether there should be some ID generated for...

So correct me if I'm wrong but, since the `RelativePointer` class is now a part of the public API, anyone could in theory use it, which means that anyone can...