gouchi

Indeed Vulkan is not integrated in the Libretro port. If needed there are some examples for Vulkan support in Libretro core in [PPSSPP](https://github.com/hrydgard/ppsspp/blob/master/libretro/LibretroVulkanContext.cpp), [Dolphin](https://github.com/libretro/dolphin/blob/master/Source/Core/DolphinLibretro/Vulkan.cpp), [Flycast](https://github.com/libretro/flycast/blob/master/core/libretro/libretro.cpp), [Swanstation](https://github.com/kivutar/swanstation/blob/master/src/duckstation-libretro/libretro_vulkan_host_display.cpp) and Libretro [Vulkan test...

As written in the [issue template](https://github.com/libretro/Lakka-LibreELEC/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md), please provide some [log](https://www.lakka.tv/doc/Troubleshooting-Lakka/) with `createlog`. Thank you.

It seems this device has been supported using [mainline Linux](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v5.16-rc1/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c#L446) (v5.16 when it is released). It seems to be available also on [Linux stable version](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c?h=v5.15.11#n437) (v5.15). Otherwise we might try...

@Ntemis @ToKe79 @RobLoach So we should consider it and it should replace dosbox-libretro and dosbox-svn. > Dosbox-core is a replacement for both -libretro and -svn. We should make a note...

Hi, Can you retry with `DISTRO=Lakka PROJECT=RPi DEVICE=RPi4 ARCH=aarch64 scripts/clean same_cdi` then `DISTRO=Lakka PROJECT=RPi DEVICE=RPi4 ARCH=aarch64 scripts/build same_cdi` Thank you.

Hi, May you try to make a test with this [testing build](https://nightly.builds.lakka.tv/members/gouchi/master/Lakka-Generic.x86_64-LE-master-devel-20220724114930-4f0cf20.img.gz) ? Thank you.

Hi, I can't reproduce your issue I can enable threaded video and I have no freeze. Can you be more precise how to to reproduce your issue step by step...

This issue should have been addressed by this [commit](https://github.com/libretro/RetroArch/commit/7e6a56dafcdeccc264701cfdf5d092585e94d2e5) but it seems it is not yet settled according to [those](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/586619/windows-11-build-ver-is-still-10022000194.html) [threads](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/555857/windows-11-product-name-in-registry.html).

We might try to make some test with [RtlGetVersion](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ddi/wdm/nf-wdm-rtlgetversion) ? But it is only available from Windows 2000. [Source](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/595325/need-to-get-real-os-version.html)

Tested quickly so far so good. ``` git fetch origin pull/14467/head:pr14467 git checkout pr14467 ``` ## Save view  ## View (xmb)  ## View (ozone)  Year 2k.lvw ```...