google-cloud-dotnet
google-cloud-dotnet copied to clipboard
feat: add support for FGAC spanner
Hi @jskeet and @amanda-tarafa ,
This is a prototype PR for Spanner FGAC with the approach suggested by Amanda. Its still work in progress. Please have a look and provide your valuable feedback. Thanks,
I'll take a look when I'm back, or maybe before if I can.
To what extent is this ready for an actual full review? I'd rather not do several rounds of review when it's not expected to be ready to merge.
Hey @jskeet @amanda-tarafa, I have updated the PR with the latest changes for FGAC. However I just saw that some tests are failing. I am looking into this. Please do not review will let you know once this fixed.
Thanks,
@hemanshv Please also make sure that you have run all integration tests locally and that they are all green before sending the PR for review. Thanks!
Hey @jskeet @amanda-tarafa The issue with the Integration tests are now fixed. Please review the PR and provide your valuable feedback. Thanks,
Hey @amanda-tarafa , Thanks for the feedback, will work on the comments and update the PR. Thanks,
Hey @amanda-tarafa I have addressed the review comments. Please have a look and provide your feedback. Thanks,
Hey @amanda-tarafa , I have addressed all the review comment apart from the ones related to stats deprecation in commit 2f51daf. Will address the changes related to deprecation in the next commit. Please have a look and provide your feedback.
Thanks.
@hemanshv I'll look again when both commits are in, unless there's something in particular you want me to look at first. Is that OK?
Yes @amanda-tarafa thats fine Thanks
Hey @amanda-tarafa,
I have updated the PR with both the commits. Please have a look and provide your feedback.
Thanks @amanda-tarafa for the review. Will update it and let you know.
Hey @amanda-tarafa , I have updated the PR, please have a look and provide your feedback. Thanks,
I'll look tomorrow or Thursday morning - if @hemanshv is able to fix these before I review, that would avoid any duplication too :)
Can this PR now be marked "ready for review" if we think it's ready to merge on successful review?