Transformation idea: extend trivial for loop range

[paulthomson]

E.g.

for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
  ...
}

->

for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
  if (i >= 3) { break; }
  ...
}

This might difficult to reduce.

[afd]

This could be encoded as:

for (int i = 0; i < _GLF_ENLARGED_LOOP_BOUND(i, 3, 100); ++i) {
    if (_GLF_ENLARGED_LOOP_BREAK(i, i >= 3) {
         break;
    } else {
        // original statements
    }
}

The reducer would then be able to reverse the transformation by identifying and acting on a pair of such macros that use the same loop variable, i.

[shubhav99]

Hi there I want to solve this issue Please help me through this

[afd]

I suggest you revisit this after you've solved #958. (In the meantime it would be fine for someone else to take this one.)

[PRATHAM0908]

i m interested to solve this problem

[KishkinJ10]

i am a beginner i want to solve this issue please help me

[MUzairS15]

hey can anyone give more insight i mean what example that has been mentioned only that we have to add?

[Rishi6229]

hello can i work in this issue?

[nived1967]

hello i am a beginner in this issue,could you please tell me how to get started

[unnati914]

hi could i work on this issue?

[Jdbarad]

I like to Work On this issue, Please Give me a Chance.

[shashikant649sharma]

I would like to work on this issue.

[aditya-mistri]

I would like to solve this issue , give me a chance