goodboy

> Alternatively the stream could be opened without using async with and then provide objects for send, recv which support it much like trio' s mem chans? Yeah I'm starting...

The last thing I have questions about is whether we need to support individual send vs. recv stream cloning. Cloning on a recv side stream **makes obvious sense** since it'll...

Thanks to @nimaje for further examples that might provide further incentive for send side cloning. Quoting from `trio` gitter: ```python async def run_pair(send_channel, …): async def partner(…): … try: while...

> If you could tuck the CBS concept into a plugin or middleware-style module and have an alternative or bare-implementation which allows everything to be called by everyone, that would...

You'll also find that pretty much every *RPC system* (especially in python) started out in "bare mode" and eventually changes to an explicit capabilities mode with the "bare mode" as...

> I tend to roll my eyes when looking at documentation about a new tool where the first 2 pages are about creating ACLs, generating certs and adding oauth headers,...

@parity3 btw we also have a [small chat room now](https://matrix.to/#/!tractor:matrix.org) if interested:

I *think* this is mostly done once #197 lands?

@njsmith thanks for the input :+1: I'll be trying to take a look at `trzmq` again hopefully soon!

After looking at the trials involved with getting `trzmq` working I've instead opted to experimenting with `nanomg ng` (aka [`nng`](https://github.com/nanomsg/nng)) for which there is a new python wrapper [`pynng`](https://github.com/codypiersall/pynng/) being...