Feat: add acr ee support

[njucjc]

Thank you for contributing to Harbor!

Comprehensive Summary of your change

Feat: add acr ee support

Issue being fixed

Fixes #19659

Please indicate you've done the following:

• [x] Well Written Title and Summary of the PR
• [x] Label the PR as needed. "release-note/ignore-for-release, release-note/new-feature, release-note/update, release-note/enhancement, release-note/community, release-note/breaking-change, release-note/docs, release-note/infra, release-note/deprecation"
• [x] Accepted the DCO. Commits without the DCO will delay acceptance.
• [x] Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• [x] Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed in website repository.

[njucjc]

@AllForNothing @chlins @MinerYang @ctrlaltdel PTAL

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 46.32%. Comparing base (c8c11b4) to head (f899243). Report is 257 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19658      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.36%   46.32%   +0.95%     
==========================================
  Files         244      247       +3     
  Lines       13333    13779     +446     
  Branches     2719     2845     +126     
==========================================
+ Hits         6049     6383     +334     
- Misses       6983     7066      +83     
- Partials      301      330      +29     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	46.32% <ø> (+0.95%)	:arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 491 files with indirect coverage changes

[wy65701436]

Thanks, @njucjc for your contribution.

I have a couple of basic questions:

• Is it possible to set up a staging environment of ACR EE for our validation and regression purposes?
• Also, considering that the replication adapter ships with harbor-core, which requires CVE and bug fixes, would you be responsible for maintaining this adapter?

[njucjc]

Thanks, @njucjc for your contribution.

I have a couple of basic questions:

• Is it possible to set up a staging environment of ACR EE for our validation and regression purposes?
• Also, considering that the replication adapter ships with harbor-core, which requires CVE and bug fixes, would you be responsible for maintaining this adapter?

@wy65701436

• Of course, I can provide an ACR EE instance for regression verification. What is the best way for me to provide this ACR EE instance for you to verify？it has been verified by myself.
• Sure, It's my honor to maintain this adapter.

By the way, I fix some UTTEST errors

[njucjc]

any comments?

[njucjc]

Thanks, @njucjc for your contribution. I have a couple of basic questions:

• Is it possible to set up a staging environment of ACR EE for our validation and regression purposes?
• Also, considering that the replication adapter ships with harbor-core, which requires CVE and bug fixes, would you be responsible for maintaining this adapter?

@wy65701436

• Of course, I can provide an ACR EE instance for regression verification. What is the best way for me to provide this ACR EE instance for you to verify？it has been verified by myself.
• Sure, It's my honor to maintain this adapter.

By the way, I fix some UTTEST errors

@wy65701436 I send an ACR EE acount for you in email

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR is being marked stale due to a period of inactivty. If this PR is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this PR will close in 30 days.

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR is being marked stale due to a period of inactivty. If this PR is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this PR will close in 30 days.

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 30 days with no activity. If this PR is still relevant, please re-open a new PR against main.

[njucjc]

@wy65701436 maybe reopen it?

[OrlinVasilev]

just a reminder, as discussed please add test cases :)

[njucjc]

just a reminder, as discussed please add test cases :)

I will add ut as soon as possible

[njucjc]

lgtm

@chlins fix some ut error.

[kofj]

@njucjc I watched the demo recording of the community meeting on July 24, 2024. Can you verify that the personal version of ACR is functioning properly at the same time?

[njucjc]

@njucjc I watched the demo recording of the community meeting on July 24, 2024. Can you verify that the personal version of ACR is functioning properly at the same time?

@kofj Yes, the personal version of ACR can be working well at the same time.