Error Response like RFC 7807

[pratik-k-ev]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I want to return response with much more detail.

Describe the solution you'd like According to RFC 7807, can update the error response to support those fields.

Describe alternatives you've considered Not sure, maybe error customize the error response payload.

[Umang01-hash]

@pratik-k-ev can you please elaborate your issue. Want to know more about the problem you are facing and how we can help to resolve it

[pratik-k-ev]

The current error response format is

{
    "error": {
        "message": "..."
    }
}

I wanted to extend error response fields and standardize according to RFC 7807.

Fields in RFC 7807

{
  "type": "string",
  "title": "string",
  "status": "integer",
  "detail": "string",
  "instance": "string",
  "extensions": {
    "field_name": "value"
  }
}

Is there way to follow this, or extend current error response fields?

[coolwednesday]

@Umang01-hash , Please assign this issue to me .....

[coolwednesday]

Hey @pratik-k-ev, the error approach is proposed and I can see it has also become obsolete being replaced by RFC 9457.

We might extend support to send such errors through custom errors, however can you please let me know if this is still under proposal or has been accepted ?

Based on that, we can work on this feature for your usecase.

[pratik-k-ev]

Is there a way to customise error payload fields..?

[coolwednesday]

@Umang01-hash, This PR can be closed now.