feat(middleware/validate): replace PGV by protovalidate-go

[perriea]

Description (what this PR does / why we need it):

• [x] Replace PGV by protovalidate-go on validate package,
• [x] Remove PGV on kratos cli

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (resolves / be part of):

#3081

WARNING It's a breaking change !

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c7fa51d) 84.62% compared to head (e90f165) 84.11%.

:exclamation: Current head e90f165 differs from pull request most recent head 1ff90bb. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1ff90bb to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
middleware/validate/validate.go	28.57%	4 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3084      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.62%   84.11%   -0.52%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines        3993     3997       +4     
==========================================
- Hits         3379     3362      -17     
- Misses        440      457      +17     
- Partials      174      178       +4     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[perriea]

@shenqidebaozi we have everything, but I don't know how to test validation with this new format. If you have an idea... https://github.com/go-kratos/kratos/pull/3084/files#diff-ab47f4f86064e3934ea13b3f4611a2a223f0655e51afbeea00b989d25ecadc75R32

[perriea]

@shenqidebaozi Let me remind you, any opinion ?

[IfanTsai]

Any update for this PR?

[perriea]

Any update for this PR?

This change is important, but I have no answer... Sorry

[shenqidebaozi]

Please fix the issue of github action line failure first

[shenqidebaozi]

Also, should we treat PGV as some kind of implementation, with the standard interface in validate

[perriea]

Please fix the issue of github action line failure first

We have a problem on the CI, I have an error unrelated to my modifications (contrib)...

[shenqidebaozi]

Your code changes contain many contrib changes. You may consider resubmitting a PR or abandoning other changes and only modifying PGV

[shenqidebaozi]

@perriea I see that this PR has been closed. Is there any problem?

[shenqidebaozi]

The current PR only needs to remove additional modifications. Also, can the validate interface be retained and PGV be used as a new implementation. What do you think?

[perriea]

@perriea I see that this PR has been closed. Is there any problem?

One of my colleagues accidentally deleted my fork... this action closed my PR...