gno icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
gno copied to clipboard

docs: resolve documentation TODOs and add missing badges

Open Copilot opened this issue 1 week ago • 2 comments

Addressed three documentation TODOs that were blocking self-sufficiency and completeness.

Changes

  • README.md: Added codecov badge for examples section following existing pattern
  • gnovm/cmd/gno/README.md: Replaced empty TODO with quick-start examples and documentation links
  • gno.land/cmd/gnoland/README.md: Removed external blog dependency, added comprehensive setup guide covering development mode, production mode, and configuration management

All changes are documentation-only. The gnoland README is now self-sufficient without requiring external resources.

Original prompt

Checkout my inactive repos with a lot of stars and suggest low hanging fruit maintenance things


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot avatar Dec 13 '25 12:12 Copilot

Testing...

moul avatar Dec 13 '25 12:12 moul

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
  • [ ] The pull request description provides enough details
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 leohhhn n0izn0iz notJoon omarsy x1unix] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🟢 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission
The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

  • team core-contributors

Gno2D2 avatar Dec 13 '25 12:12 Gno2D2