chore: gno.land homepage fixes
Description
Fixing links, updating items, adding columns back in. Adding more discoverability features via package search features by gnoweb & qpath.
🛠 PR Checks Summary
🔴 Changes related to gnoweb must be reviewed by its codeowners
Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
- [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More
🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.
✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):
🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) 🔴 Changes related to gnoweb must be reviewed by its codeowners 🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff
☑️ Contributor Actions:
- Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
- Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
- Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
- Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
- Update documentation, if required.
- Ensure no breaking changes, or include
BREAKING CHANGEnotes. - Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
- Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$ └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: leohhhn/gno)Then
🟢 Requirement satisfied └── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull requestChanges related to gnoweb must be reviewed by its codeowners
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$ └── 🟢 A changed file matches this pattern: ^gno.land/pkg/gnoweb/ (filename: gno.land/pkg/gnoweb/app.go)Then
🔴 Requirement not satisfied └── 🔴 Or ├── 🔴 Or │ ├── 🔴 And │ │ ├── 🔴 Pull request author is user: alexiscolin │ │ └── 🔴 This user reviewed pull request: gfanton (with state "APPROVED") │ └── 🔴 And │ ├── 🔴 Pull request author is user: gfanton │ └── 🔴 This user reviewed pull request: alexiscolin (with state "APPROVED") └── 🔴 And ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: alexiscolin) ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: gfanton) └── 🔴 Or ├── 🔴 This user reviewed pull request: alexiscolin (with state "APPROVED") └── 🔴 This user reviewed pull request: gfanton (with state "APPROVED")Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$ └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)Then
🟢 Requirement satisfied └── 🟢 If ├── 🟢 Condition │ └── 🟢 Or │ ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED") │ ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request │ └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft └── 🟢 Then └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending) └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull requestManual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 On every pull requestCan be checked by
- Any user with comment edit permission
Points:
- Add this page back to the home page https://gno.land/contribute
- Figure out why events aren't showing up on the events realm
- Add email sign up back https://github.com/gnolang/gno/issues/3801 from Alexis
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
Should we add a column or header or similar to lead users to the r/gnoland/coins balance checker?