gno icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
gno copied to clipboard

feat(home): louonezime home realm

Open louonezime opened this issue 7 months ago • 7 comments

with some pure package that locks content and interactive rating system

MOVED THIS AWAY FROM MY PERSONAL REPO IN CASE

Pure Packages

  • [x] comment /p/lou/comment
    • simple comment creation
  • [x] 8ball /p/lou/eightball
  • [x] rps /p/lou/rps
  • [x] tokenaccess /p/lou/tokenaccess
    • to simplify reward systems, check on allowance/balance for locking content
  • [x] ~~Ascii /p/lou/ascii~~ ~~for ui component~~
    • https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4271
    • DELETED

Realms

  • [x] Home /r/lou/home
    • Basic rock paper scissors --> with reward system with grc20
    • Magic 8ball to add interaction --> limited access based on token allowance
    • Ratings --> interactive rating + comment section
    • SVG example

louonezime avatar May 13 '25 11:05 louonezime

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
  • [ ] The pull request description provides enough details
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) 🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: louonezime/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 leohhhn n0izn0iz notJoon omarsy x1unix] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🟢 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission
The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

  • team core-contributors

Gno2D2 avatar May 13 '25 11:05 Gno2D2

Hi @louonezime . Are you able to fix the CI errors for lint? You can see the errors on your own computer by running make lint in the examples folder.

jefft0 avatar May 21 '25 15:05 jefft0

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

codecov[bot] avatar May 22 '25 10:05 codecov[bot]

hey! we merged the ascii pacakge, so you can remove it from this PR. just merge in master and use it :)

leohhhn avatar May 22 '25 15:05 leohhhn

I am thinking of making this realm a bit better by removing any unecessary package, like maybe the rps package as it may not be the best. Feel free to tell me what's best :)

louonezime avatar May 28 '25 09:05 louonezime

Hi @louonezime . A fix for the failed CI check was merged to master (an hour after your last "Update branch"). Can you please "Update branch" again to see if it fixes the check?

jefft0 avatar May 28 '25 14:05 jefft0

Hey @louonezime,

We're good to go apart from one thing: updating to the new crossing syntax:

func MyFunc(cur realm, ....) {}

app.MyFunc(cross, ...)

leohhhn avatar Jun 10 '25 14:06 leohhhn