chore: add interrealm exploration txtars
I'm exploring the interrealm behaviors using txtars, thought it could be nice to share it here
You can run them with go test -v ./gno.land/pkg/integration -run TestTestdata/interrealm_mix
🛠 PR Checks Summary
All Automated Checks passed. ✅
Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
- [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More
🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.
✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):
🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) 🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff
☑️ Contributor Actions:
- Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
- Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
- Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
- Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
- Update documentation, if required.
- Ensure no breaking changes, or include
BREAKING CHANGEnotes. - Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
- Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$ └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: n0izn0iz/gno)Then
🟢 Requirement satisfied └── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull requestPending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$ └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)Then
🟢 Requirement satisfied └── 🟢 If ├── 🟢 Condition │ └── 🟢 Or │ ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED") │ ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request │ └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft └── 🟢 Then └── 🟢 And ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending) └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull requestManual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 On every pull requestCan be checked by
- Any user with comment edit permission
i like it!
i suggest you to add a maketx run call
@moul added maketx run port
if someone can explain why the "MutateCrossingObjectRootedAtCaller" case is not panicking in the maketx run version, I'd gladly hear it
cc @jaekwon
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
Hi @n0izn0iz . Will these examples need to be updated when the "cross" syntax is changed by PR https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4316 ?
no idea, it's not clear what the changes are, I'll check once it's merged
Hi @n0izn0iz . PR https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4316 is merged. Do you plan to update this PR with the new crossing syntax?
@jefft0 yes, it is done