gno icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
gno copied to clipboard

chore: add interrealm exploration txtars

Open n0izn0iz opened this issue 7 months ago • 11 comments

I'm exploring the interrealm behaviors using txtars, thought it could be nice to share it here

You can run them with go test -v ./gno.land/pkg/integration -run TestTestdata/interrealm_mix

n0izn0iz avatar May 03 '25 12:05 n0izn0iz

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) 🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: n0izn0iz/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 And
            ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)
            └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission

Gno2D2 avatar May 03 '25 12:05 Gno2D2

i like it!

moul avatar May 03 '25 20:05 moul

i suggest you to add a maketx run call

moul avatar May 03 '25 20:05 moul

@moul added maketx run port

n0izn0iz avatar May 07 '25 14:05 n0izn0iz

if someone can explain why the "MutateCrossingObjectRootedAtCaller" case is not panicking in the maketx run version, I'd gladly hear it

n0izn0iz avatar May 07 '25 17:05 n0izn0iz

cc @jaekwon

leohhhn avatar May 13 '25 10:05 leohhhn

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

codecov[bot] avatar May 13 '25 21:05 codecov[bot]

Hi @n0izn0iz . Will these examples need to be updated when the "cross" syntax is changed by PR https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4316 ?

jefft0 avatar May 28 '25 14:05 jefft0

no idea, it's not clear what the changes are, I'll check once it's merged

n0izn0iz avatar May 28 '25 14:05 n0izn0iz

Hi @n0izn0iz . PR https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4316 is merged. Do you plan to update this PR with the new crossing syntax?

jefft0 avatar Jun 10 '25 12:06 jefft0

@jefft0 yes, it is done

n0izn0iz avatar Jun 11 '25 10:06 n0izn0iz