feat: integrate OTEL/Jaeger

[hthieu1110]

Implementation for https://github.com/gnolang/gno/issues/2434

We can filter by BlockHeight

We can trace the calls

[Gno2D2]

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):

• [ ] IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info) 🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:

1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
   • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
   • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
   • Update documentation, if required.
   • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
   • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.

☑️ Reviewer Actions:

1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.

📚 Resources:

• Report a bug with the bot.
• View the bot’s configuration file.

Debug

Automated Checks

Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: hthieu1110/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🟢 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 And
            ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)
            └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request

Manual Checks

**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

• Any user with comment edit permission

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 42.07921% with 117 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tm2/pkg/telemetry/traces/traces.go	0.00%	34 Missing :warning:
tm2/pkg/bft/consensus/state.go	69.23%	31 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
tm2/pkg/telemetry/metrics/metrics.go	0.00%	21 Missing :warning:
tm2/pkg/telemetry/init.go	13.63%	19 Missing :warning:
tm2/pkg/telemetry/config/global.go	25.00%	6 Missing :warning:
tm2/pkg/telemetry/tracer.go	50.00%	4 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[hthieu1110]

thankss @gfanton for you time and your reviews, I have some questions related to your review. Could you check it when you're available pls ? thankss

[hthieu1110]

hi @gfanton, I've updated the code with your suggested changes, could you take a look again pls :) I've checked, normally all the code related to addSpan are already after the lock acquisition.

[thehowl]

Can you address the failing CI?

[hthieu1110]

hiii @gfanton , sorry for my late reply. Seems that some tests are broken on master, I'm waiting a little bit for that to be fixed first.

[hthieu1110]

@zivkovicmilos I addressed your feedbacks, please re-check this PR :) thanks