feat(examples): Implement p/demo/bitmap
Description
From issue : https://github.com/gnolang/gno/issues/2119
A simple implementation of bitmap in p/demo/bitmap :
- Logic code
- Test cases
Contributors' checklist...
- [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
- [ ] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
- [ ] Updated the official documentation or not needed
- [x] No breaking changes were made, or a
BREAKING CHANGE: xxxmessage was included in the description - [ ] Added references to related issues and PRs
- [ ] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
- [ ] Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.
@zivkovicmilos @leohhhn what do you think about this utility ?
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 60.21%. Comparing base (
65ee7a5) to head (94834d1).
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2115 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.24% 60.21% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 562 562
Lines 75031 75031
==========================================
- Hits 45200 45183 -17
- Misses 26458 26473 +15
- Partials 3373 3375 +2
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| contribs/gnodev | 61.40% <ø> (ø) |
|
| contribs/gnofaucet | 14.46% <ø> (-0.86%) |
:arrow_down: |
| misc/genstd | 80.54% <ø> (ø) |
|
| misc/logos | 19.88% <ø> (ø) |
|
| tm2 | 62.05% <ø> (-0.05%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
This PR is stale because it has been open 3 months with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 3 months.
I'm a bot that assists the Gno Core team in maintaining this repository. My role is to ensure that contributors understand and follow our guidelines, helping to streamline the development process.
The following requirements must be fulfilled before a pull request can be merged. Some requirement checks are automated and can be verified by the CI, while others need manual verification by a staff member.
These requirements are defined in this configuration file.
Automated Checks
🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request 🔴 The pull request head branch must be up-to-date with its base
Manual Checks
- [ ] The pull request description provides enough details
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 On every pull requestThen
🟢 Requirement satisfied └── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull requestThe pull request head branch must be up-to-date with its base
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 On every pull requestThen
🔴 Requirement not satisfied └── 🔴 Head branch (linhpn99:add-package-bitmap) is up to date with base (master): behind by 212 / ahead by 49Manual Checks
The pull request description provides enough details
If
🟢 Condition met └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)Can be checked by
- team core-contributors
I'm closing this PR as the author has not been contributing to Gno for a while.
Feel free to re-open this PR, or fork this PR and propose a new one, considering the latest comments and any surrounding discussion.