George-Cristian Muraru

Results 82 issues of George-Cristian Muraru

## Description Add the gradient functions for the list of operations: - [x] add - [PR](https://github.com/OpenMined/SyMPC/pull/161) - [x] sub - [PR](https://github.com/OpenMined/SyMPC/pull/161) - [x] mul - [PR](https://github.com/OpenMined/SyMPC/pull/161) - [x] sum -...

feature

## Description The graph for runtime can be seen [here](https://openmined.github.io/SyMPC/dev/bench/) Showcase how we do regarding runtime by having a comparison with torch. ## Are you interested in working on this...

documentation

## Description There are probably going to be more PRs that are going to solve this issue. ## Are you interested in working on this improvement yourself? - Yes, I...

good first issue

## Where? Add a link to the benchmark on our [github page](https://openmined.github.io/SyMPC/) that should link to the benchmarks. ## Who? Anyone that wants to check how the library is doing...

good first issue

To properly test SyMPC we need to have installed the syft_0.3.0. Add a method to simulate the parties operations (send and get) such that we might have a simple way...

enhancement

## Description PyScaffold was used to generate the project directory hierarchy. There is a newer version of PyScaffold and we should migrate to that. ## Are you interested in working...

good first issue

## Description There is a [notebook](https://github.com/OpenMined/PySyft/tree/dev/examples/secure-multi-party-computation/Duet/Inference) where we showcase private inference using SyMPC in Syft. For the moment, the notebook showcases how a DS shares the model and the date....

documentation
good first issue

## Description For the moment the notebook is tested only when we create a PR. We should also test the notebook in case we trigger a merge. ## Are you...

good first issue

## Description Currently, to share a model we need to have it locally and then call share - in the back we share the ```state_dict``` for the ```weight``` and the...

enhancement

## Description There is a possible information leak when doing public division. At one point we reconstruct the wraps and then we do something like: ``` value = value -...

good first issue