Günter Milde
Günter Milde
> The examples in the first post are all missing the mandatory first argument, which is included without parsing. See [the documentation](https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/directives.html#describing-changes-between-versions). The feature request is to parse the first...
Please try the [halt-level](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/config.html#halt-level) configuration setting in a [Docutils configuration file](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/config.html#configuration-files) in the project root directory. (You may also want to set [traceback](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/config.html#traceback).)
Am 24.05.25 schrieb Adam Turner: > @AA-Turner commented on this pull request. > An anonymous reference? Eg DOI__. Yes. To be more precise, an *anonymous link* like ~~~ a link...
> * There is no round-trip serialisation format for Docutils ASTs. Docutils 0.22 provides round-trip serialisation with the "docutils-xml" writer and parser.
Like the "code" role, the "code" option of the "include" directive uses the Docutils version of the ["code" directive](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#code). (Sphinx overwrites the "code" directive with its own, slightly different version.)...
This is a duplicate of #1703.
> So it is, but it might be better to close [#1703](https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/1703) and leave this issue open, because this issue contains much more detailed discussion, and a workaround. Agreed. However,...
The [specification](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#percentage-unit) is a bit vague: > Percentage values are relative to other values, depending on the context in which they occur. The behaviour is currently the same in HTML...
Can we agree that this is not a bug? In this case I propose to either close the issue or change the type from "bug" to feature-request or similar.
> I strongly believe this is definitely a "bug" in the sense that the when the code was first written it is 99% certain their author did not think about...