Graham Markall
Graham Markall
The conda-forge AArch64 build of llvmlite 0.41 is failing tests with a segfault. See https://github.com/conda-forge/llvmlite-feedstock/pull/74 I note that there seems to be an issue in one of the OrcJIT tests,...
Identified in #922. * @apmasell Suggested that it may be required for emitted remarks: https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/922#issuecomment-1476061341 * On Linux and macOS, we explicitly disable it: https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/blob/main/conda-recipes/llvmdev/build_llvm14.sh#L31 We should determine whether it's...
Identified in #922. Instead of running `setup_conda_environment.cmd` to set up the environment, it runs commands inside `azure-windows.yml`. It seems that this was originally due to some issues with calling `setup_conda_environment.cmd`,...
For working on OrcJITv2 support. Current status: - Passes tests with LLVM 14.0.6 - Numba support needs work. - MCJIT example ported to LLJIT works. Current known to-do list: -...
### Describe the question. https://github.com/NVIDIA/DALI/pull/4862 disabled the Numba tests on AArch64. The AArch64 issues in Numba described in numba/numba#8567 and numba/numba#9001 were fixed by the merge of numba/llvmlite#1009 and in...
I built grist-electron as documented in the README, and I want to start learning how to use it, but I've come up against some behaviour that surprised me and I...
Dummy arrays and device ufuncs are only used by the CUDA target, and I think are not generally useful even for someone implementing a new target: - The device ufunc...
Quick notes on this based on a verbal description from @guilhermeleobas: The `specialize()` function doesn't create the specialized dispatcher with any reference to caching, so caching is broken for specialized...
Pushing this up early to request comments / feedback - I think this is one way to solve rapidsai/cudf#15694, with broad applicability to other use cases - this should allow...
This should address inconsistencies in the exceptions raised by `numpy_support.from_dtype()` and ensure that we catch its exceptions. I did consider whether we ever need to catch a `ValueError` - perhaps...