Graham Markall
Graham Markall
> Can you elaborate more on the advantages of doing it this way? Anything that uses llvmlite needs to be atomically on one pass manager or the other so having...
> As a Numba user, I do like the feature `opaque pointers`, since sometimes I need to write some lowering code in Numba with llvmlite builder/IR APIs. And many times,...
Closing - superseded by #1092.
We do have a bit of discussion around this issue in https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/8712 too (the `numba_id()` vs `id()` ideas, etc.)
Thanks for the report / request!
See also #5234
Yes, I don't think they're duplicates, I was just trying to gather together a few shape-related issues in case someone is looking at fixing up things in these areas.
@AruparnaMaity If you can see a way to fix it, you could open a PR with the fix, if you'd like - note that as per https://numba.discourse.group/t/rfc-moving-the-cuda-target-to-a-new-package-maintained-by-nvidia/2628 new PRs should...
I think this shows that #8783 is still good WRT main today.
Is this related? https://numba.discourse.group/t/are-the-results-of-this-verification-using-namedtuple-correct/3074