gluster-containers icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
gluster-containers copied to clipboard

Location for "cattle" containers

Open JohnStrunk opened this issue 7 years ago • 3 comments

In keeping with our plan to move toward "cattle" containers, I'd like to arrive at consensus on where development for them should live. I'll suggest two options:

  1. In a top-level directory like "Fedora" and "CentOS" containers currently do.
  2. In its own branch.

My favored approach is (1) because it doesn't overload branching nor require a cutover to the "new" way of using the containers at any particular time.

Also welcome are suggestions for the new directory... WDYT: "GCS"?

JohnStrunk avatar Jun 25 '18 18:06 JohnStrunk

Also, is there an actual need for both CentOS and Fedora based containers or can we just use CentOS? I can't think of a reason to have both or to even advertise the base image that we choose.

JohnStrunk avatar Jun 25 '18 18:06 JohnStrunk

Hi @JohnStrunk , by 'cattle' containers, do you mean compatibility with rancher?

shirshendu avatar Aug 07 '18 05:08 shirshendu

@shirshendu No. It's a reference to "cattle" vs. "pets". Meaning that gluster pods should not need to be treated as special, nor should the nodes on which they are scheduled.

JohnStrunk avatar Aug 13 '18 15:08 JohnStrunk