Tally of Majority Judgment-ScoreVoting: Show indiviual results of each answer and the "acceptance" level

[stefanxyz]

For transparency, I think the result page should show a more comprehensive .json result. The .json should name QuestionWording, AnswerWording, GradeWording number of votes for each score. An example to what I mean may be found here: (compare "ResultType.txt") ResultType.txt

Furthermore, the diplayed text should give more detailed information about the result: Today's tally report looks like the example below. I would appreciate the adder below.

Existing report: _According to Majority Judgment, the ranking is:

1. "Candidate 3"
2. "Candidate 1"
3. "Candidate 2"

25 valid (non-blank) ballot(s) 0 blank ballot(s)_

_I would appreciate this adder

The detailed score was:
- A01 "Candidate 1"
excellent: 1; good: 23; bad: 0; Reject: 1 (of 25 ballots; acceptance=65.33%)

- A02 "Candidate 2"
excellent: 0; good: 20; bad: 4; Reject: 1 (of 25 ballots; acceptance=58.66%)

- A03 "Candidate 3"
excellent: 4; good: 17; bad: 3; Reject: 1 (of 25 ballots; acceptance=65.33%)

[stefanxyz]

Proposal for calculating "acceptance" grades = ["excellent", "good", "bad", "reject"] // this is the grades list from the election-extra-grades scores = [num_excellent, num_good, num_bad, num_reject] //number of ballots where the grade was //checked for the answer candidate len_grades = len(grades) // length of the grades list weights=[1, 0.6666, 0.3333, 0] //generate dynamic weight list from data of grades: i.e. [(len_grades-1) .. 0 ] / (len_grades-1) acceptance = sum(weights_i * scores_i) / num_ballots ) // scalar product, calculate with a loop; number in [0...1.0]

[stefanxyz]

I have written a python script that evaluates ScoreVoting and appends result to the original .json that describes the election. It also creates .png files for each question like the picture below. These pictures could also be compiled into a pdf, if we like. Shall I upload that python project to here somewhere? However, this is my first time on GitHub.

Raw_Election_with_result.txt

[stefanxyz]

Hm, I closed this "enhancement" by mistake, I guess. This feature is still important for me.

[stefanxyz]

@glondu , is there any chance that this improvement (the text output of acceptance level in "majority judgement") will be implemented some time?