Gregory Lemieux

From today's meeting on parameter files we discussed how a future PR could utilize this infrastructure to provide a testmod for the fates seed dispersal code, since it needs reasonable...

Is this fixed? I saw discussion in the CTSM SE chat for the recent b4b-dev that suggested it was.

@ekluzek given the feedback from https://github.com/NCAR/mpibind/issues/5#issuecomment-1998714383, should I make an issue in the ccs_config_cesm repo?

During the ctsm stand-up meeting today we came up with the following actions for the time being: - [x] Add a non-serial `5x5_amazon` test to `aux_clm` on `derecho` and to...

> During the ctsm stand-up meeting today we came up with the following actions for the time being: > > * [x] Add a non-serial `5x5_amazon` test to `aux_clm` on...

The system test I added for the `use_fates_potentialveg` spin-up to transient mode run case looks to be building correctly. That said, I need to re-evaluate the potential vegetation mode checks:...

Status update: The spin-up + transient system test, `PVT` is working, but I'm currently tracking down an issue with the fates-side of the code failing during fates landuse patch reallocation...

Regression testing against https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/releases/tag/branch_tags%2Ftmp-240620.n02.ctsm5.2.007 is showing B4B results with expected DIFFs in fates testmods. That said, there is an `ERP` fates satellite phenology that's failing exact restart comparison that I...

This pull request is now updated with the [fates-side tag for land use v2](https://github.com/NGEET/fates/releases/tag/sci.1.77.0_api.36.0.0). Regression testing against `ctsm5.2.008` is showing mostly B4B results with expected DIFFs for fates testmods. There...

@samsrabin @ekluzek aux_clm testing against `ctsm5.2.011` on derecho is underway. I'm going to see if I can get things going on izumi.