glassfishrobot
glassfishrobot
Should there be standard activation properties to allow the pool of MDB instances to be configured? It's not clear whether this is desirable or not. MDBs are defined in the...
In a late change to the EJB 3.2 spec, a new feature around building MDBs without requiring method-level implementations has been added, specifically for use within the RA. I am...
This proposal suggests the addition of the following annotation: @MessageSelector, to be used on a @MessageDriven bean consumimng a Queue or as Topic Subscriber. Example: ``` package sample; // imports...
MDB is currently the only declarative way of listening for JMS messages. While the MDB model is adequate, it has a few shortcomings (primarily related to it's true age). The...
Since a JMSXDeliveryCount will be part of the JMS 2.0 requirement, also the Message interface should reflect this: public long getJMSDeliveryCount() throws JMSException #### Affected Versions [2.0]
It should be possible to define a lambda expression as a message listener, to avoid needing to implement the interface. This of course would require using Java SE 8 in...
There are some HTML errors in the released JMS 2.0 documentation at [https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0/apidocs/index.html](https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0/apidocs/index.html) For example, in the javadoc for Message: [https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0/apidocs/javax/jms/Message.html](https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0/apidocs/javax/jms/Message.html) ``` The JMS API reserves the JMS_vendor_name property ```...
When I visit [http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jms-2_0-fr-eval-spec/index.html](http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jms-2_0-fr-eval-spec/index.html) the javadocs available here are out of sync. For example, they are missing JMSContext#createContext(int sessionMode). Not sure if other content is missing. #### Affected Versions [2.0]
Several vendors currently support a special acknowledgement mode in which messages are deleted from the topic subscription or queue as soon as they are sent, without waiting for an acknowledgement...
JMS does not adequately define the behaviour of Session#getAcknowledgeMode, Session#getTransacted and JMSContext#getSessionMode in the Java EE web or EJB container. **What the spec currently says about these methods** The javadoc...