New syntax for arguments proposal

[askucher]

Currently we have

func = (arg1, arg2, arg3)-->
   ....

or

func = (arg1) -> (arg2, arg3)-->
   ....

I think it is good to have

func = (arg1 | arg2, arg3)-->
   ....

[hmaurer]

I think it would also be good to have

func = (arg{1..3})-->
 ...

Like the range syntax in Haskell, to avoid having to write arg1, arg2, arg3. It's a waste of characters methinks.

[rhendric]

@hmaurer, if this is a serious proposal, would you create a new issue for it please? (Also, do you know about &0, &1, etc.?)

[hmaurer]

@rhendric Sorry, I was trolling 🙄

[rhendric]

:dart: You got me!

(For the future, though, please don't; given the quality of ideas that get proposed around here sometimes, I kind of have to assume that they're all sincere.)

[danielo515]

I don't understand what is the objective of this proposal. Is for currying some arguments ?