Gregg Kellogg
Gregg Kellogg
You might want to move this over to https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-bp if you think this belongs as a JSON-LD Best Practice. But, note that JSON-LD does support indexing on property values, language...
There are a couple of ways to do this: You can create a single JSON document containing both A.json and B.json in an Array, flatten it, then compact using your...
Arguably, LD Signatures is not JSON-LD specific, and could be done on the raw triples. If another playground for this comes about, that might be a good place for it....
Doesn't happen in Safari, but I verified it in Chrome.
+1, it looks good to me!
JSON-LD doesn't actually use the term "CURIE", but rather [Compact IRI](https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#dfn-compact-iri), which is essentially the same thing. Also related are [PNames](https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-parsing-state) and [QNames](https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-QName), but all have subtle differences.
They are defined in the spec, and there is code to support them in the underlying jsonld.js, but I think it’s been held up from being deployed due to some...
@davidlehn this should be possible, given the inherent support in jsonld.js. Presumably need an option to set the mime type to invoke that part of the algorithm?
@danbri This comes down to a best practice rather than any specification language. IMHO, the best way to do this is to combine JSON-LD and RDFa. When parsed as part...
Note that RFCs are an IETF thing, but there may be a similar concept in the W3C process. As a CG, I believe we can operate any way we want,...