Gregg Kellogg

Presumably, the problem lies in the term selection algorithm, rather than the compaction algorithm itself. Are there some specific errata that should be raised against the spec?

We've been holding off on making normative updates, in case we want to publish an update with editorial changes only. But, highlighting the proposed updates in the issue, would be...

We could update the introduction to say that the JSON-LD document is expected to be in the form of the `map` result of the `Node Map Generation algorithm`, but really...

Summary: in 13.7.4.2.3 the tex erroneously says "If item is neither `@none` nor [well-formed](https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-api/#dfn-well-formed) according to [section 2.2.9](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5646#section-2.2.9) of [[BCP47](https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-api/#bib-bcp47)]," It should be checking for "language" which is the intention...

Thanks, @Johann150, good catch. It should how show up as an [erratum](https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-api/errata/).

The implication in the Expand Algorithm step 13.12.1 is that _if_ must either be a _node object_ or a _graph object_, and not a _value object_. I agree that if...

This issue was discussed in a [meeting](https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/585). PR w3c/json-ld-api#585 ✪ https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/585 -> Pull Request 585 Add graph container array tests. (by davidlehn) [test:missing-coverage] ✪ David I. Lehn: Do we have...

> If we are to make a significant change to the spec for handling this corner case (which, IIUC, would be required to justify these test results), I think I...

There are a number of instances where the algorithm says "for each _x_ and _y_ ordered by _x_" or something similar. Unless _x_ is a numeric value (such as _length_)...

This issue was discussed in a [meeting](https://json-ld.org/minutes/2024-03-06/#38). Issue w3c/json-ld-api#586 ✪ https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/586 -> Issue 586 Meaning of "ordered by" in Node Map Generation step 6.12 (by danpape) [spec:substantive] [needs discussion] [ErratumRaised]...