github
Try to explain how to deal with secure 2fa requirements
Enabling Secure 2FA requirements results in lots of confusing outcomes for people and there really isn't good text anywhere to help people. This is one step to try to improve the story a bit.
Why:
- https://github.com/github/docs/issues/38087#issuecomment-3362408995
What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
Check off the following:
- [ ] A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
- [ ] The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
- [ ] All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.
How to review these changes 👓
Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:
A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.
Table of review links
Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.
The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on a staging server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.
| Source | Review | Production | What Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
organizations/keeping-your-organization-secure/managing-two-factor-authentication-for-your-organization/requiring-two-factor-authentication-in-your-organization.md |
fpt ghec ghes@ 3.17 3.16 3.15 3.14 |
fpt ghec ghes@ 3.17 3.16 3.15 3.14 |
Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server
🤖 This comment is automatically generated.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@jsoref Okay, this looks like a suitably modest change to me. I will try to figure out whom I need to speak to for approval, and hopefully having actual wording will make that process easier. 🤞
A stale label has been added to this pull request because it has been open 30 days with no activity. If you think this pull request should remain open, please add a new comment.
@Sharra-writes any luck in finding the designated reviewer? Surely this shouldn't be taking two months
