"ansi_term is Unmaintained" is not a security advisory

[KamilaBorowska]

I don't think GHSA-74w3-p89x-ffgh is a security advisory, and as such probably shouldn't be in Advisory Database. This crate does what it's supposed to, and there are no known security vulnerabilities in it.

On RUSTSEC (https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0139.html), it's indicated as "Unmaintained" advisory, not a security one.

[KamilaBorowska]

This was a response to a comment that appears to have been deleted.

It's security advisory as others but it should be represented in canonical way as RustSec intended.

Readme for https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/ makes it clear that it's not:

The database also contains non-security advisories (known as informational advisories), such as advisories about unmaintained crates, which are optionally surfaced as warnings in cargo audit.

[sduquette-devolutions]

These github advisories are assigned the Critical severity while they are marked as Info in the RUSTSEC database. The severity should be lowered if these advisories are kept.

[darakian]

Closing this issue out as the advisory has been withdrawn. Apologies for the error 🙇