git.github.io
git.github.io copied to clipboard
Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 89
A currently mostly empty draft is there:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-89.md
Feel free to comment in this issue, suggest topics, suggest persons to interview, or use the edit button (that looks like a pen) to edit and create a pull request with the changes you would like.
Let's try to publish this edition on Wednesday July 27th 2022!
Thanks!
cc @jnareb @mjaix @sivaraam @gitster
- [PATCH 0/6] bundle URIs: design doc and initial git fetch --bundle-uri implementation might be interesting
- if it is still relevant at the time of publishing, information about Git Contributor's Summit 2022 registration might be important
- a very short support story for an unusual use case: git: detect file creator
My links have landed in ba77652.
Feel free to delete link to article about Software Freedom Conservancy calling to abandon GitHub (because of Code Copilot), as it is not strictly about Git itself.
Supplied the my usual tiny fixes in 5014d8b , feel free to further revise it. Reading Junio's text was great fun.
@jnareb thanks for your links and your suggestions.
About the Contributor Summit, yeah we definitely should add a link to Taylor's post. So I did it in 5763d84485d560849dff8ae3a808629b31f95291
a very short support story for an unusual use case: git: detect file creator
I like it but it is maybe a bit too recent, and it looks like the thread might not be finished.
[PATCH 0/6] bundle URIs: design doc and initial git fetch --bundle-uri implementation might be interesting
V3 has been sent recently and there might be further discussions on it.
Both are good suggestions for next month though!
@mjaix thanks for your fixes, they LGTM!
... followed up by even better ones ... I love iterative teamwork :-)
Draft notification email sent https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAP8UFD2OngQR7KOS3rAFOK0z9VhPNHbXC3PfpO0c4QXP=OhW1Q@mail.gmail.com/ and publication date changed to July 31st.
Would github specific tools (a code review helper) like :
https://github.com/danobi/prr
be worth including?
Supplied some more rephrasings in bb59be9 . Feel free to revise/revert/improve ...
@carenas yeah I think it's worth including, thanks! Would you send a PR? Would you like us to include it?
@mjaix, thanks for your rephrasings! They LGTM.
@carenas yeah I think it's worth including, thanks! Would you send a PR? Would you like us to include it?
not worth delaying the release IMHO, could be also material for next issue.
@carenas Ok, let's add it to the next edition.
Issue published and announced in https://public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD2nn134W+4a1vk+Ge-ARncM+sSUv-2gSObu7tni7mX4VA@mail.gmail.com/ !