gingerBill
gingerBill
I am now wondering what the better approach is in terms of initialization order for global variables. I originally wanted just a topological sort depending on their dependencies but I...
I do not like the name `Array` because that is way too overloaded of a term. I used `Small_Array` because it's to suggest it is for "small" arrays 😛 `Inline_Array`...
I am not sure what to do in this case. Firstly: why the heck are you doing what you are doing?!?!?! Secondly: maybe we should just ban this from being...
Please keep these requests separate since they are quite different. However the first one is possible to add and something I have considered before. The second one is not at...
So the reason crashes is that IIRC the data for the dynamic array is initially stored on the stack AND then copied to the dynamic array. So the kind of...
This bug is due to a having a deferred procedure call something that has a deferred attribute. It's a logic bug causing a stack overflow.
This bug is caused by the array-programming cast but it should not be allowed.
Why not just exclude `wasm` on those targets rather than explicitly adding everything else?
We don't support BECAUSE the order might be different for foreign software. There isn't a good way to make this work properly because quaternions in other places could be xyzw...
Maybe the best option is to allow us to specify the order in the struct tags. e.g. ```odin field_a: quaternion256 `json:"field_a,xyzw"`, field_b: quaternion256 `json:"field_b,wxyz"`, ```