treat http.ErrAbortHandler as broken pipe too

[tmm1]

cc #1714

similar to https://github.com/gorilla/handlers/pull/159/files

[m1o1]

Was looking for this as well. Would it make sense to use errors.Is instead of using == to compare, in case something wraps this error with another error?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #2590 (01c93c1) into master (4d2dad5) will decrease coverage by 0.09%. The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2590      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.49%   98.39%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        1989     1991       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         1959     1959              
- Misses         17       18       +1     
- Partials       13       14       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
recovery.go	94.52% <0.00%> (-2.67%)	:arrow_down:

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d2dad5...01c93c1. Read the comment docs.

[maggie44]

Also running in to this one, is it possible to get this merged?

Here is the info from Golang on this being the proper way to handle the aborts:

https://github.com/golang/go/issues/28239 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/23643