Richard Gibson

> Or is it more along the lines of: you have a number of workers and those handle individual tests as they become available to accept a new test? Yes....

> However, I think any use case involving DOM would require the iframe approach (which may not necessarily be a bad thing). Rare indeed is the test that requires a...

Thank you for mentioning me. I have not intentionally abandoned QUnit, I just ran out of spare time to work on it (there are about 100 QUnit notifications in my...

I think the answer is for worker plugin authors (i.e., "us") to scrape the relevant information by whatever means makes sense for the master–worker pair (maybe URL for page–page as...

I like this, and note also the (loosely) related #947.

This is a practical issue that would be resolved by implementing #869.

One argument against any "seconds since epoch" representation is that (at least under the [prevailing POSIX semantics](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_16)) it is incapable of representing an instant within a positive leap second (since...

> Do any current HTTP implementations take leap seconds into account? I don't know, but leap seconds _are_ explicitly supported by [`HTTP-date`](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-5.6.7): > ``` > time-of-day = hour ":" minute...

I don't know what counts as "in the wild", but there is certainly documentation of [people observing leap seconds](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJyek-YP60) and [software failing upon encountering them](https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/linux-blamed-for-leap-second-that-humbled-internet/46400).

Also related: #2236