giadarol
giadarol
Thank you! This is in fact how it is intended to be used, since the twiss and survey that you use to configure the bb lenses are significantly slower on...
Is this already available in some other simulation codes?
Would you have a working AT example that one could benchmark against?
Hello, we are prioritizing the issues to be followed up. @ab-gh how urgent is this one? is this limiting your studies?
Good idea! I add a couple more things, to that we don't forget.
In general also inside the class I would avoid the name 'rms_bunch_length' and use 'sigma_zeta' or 'sigma_tau' to avoid confusion
In fact we never meant to support "empty" arrays (size zero). It happens to work on other context just by accident. Indeed the example works for n=1: ```python import numpy...
I find it a bit dangerous, this is tested nowhere in the test suite. I would not exclude surprises down the road
Some checks implemented in xtrack v0.10.0 (absence of RF is detected)
Related to #18