Williams A. Lima

Looks like one of those issues that end up in the silent and peaceful realm of forgotten issues :). I can think of some possibilities, a major concern is compatibility...

Great. It is a headache when the documentation is not synchronized with the source code. Many times, I got lost trying to reproduce an example from an open-source code just...

I had already experienced this too. My solution was to do sim1._Jmatrix = None sim1.getJ(myModel) in order to force getJ to return J for myModel.

We could use checksum to check if the model has changed. Very vague idea here.

It makes sense. It looks very natural to treat the physical properties in the same foot as other quantities like the physical fields. Maybe, to not create another hierarchy of...

@santisoler @dccowan Done all the suggested changes!

That would be certainly very important for large scale 3d problems. How can I help?

I'd like to look at this issue, particularly at the problem of computation of the Jacobian matrices, if indeed there is something that can be done to improve its performance.

I confirmed the existence of this bug. The correction looks straightforward. @lheagy I'm working on the necessary corrections in maps.py:ParametricCircleMap.

Hi, I've just downloaded the plugin and started using it. Indeed I can't see the names of Fortran intrinsic functions/subroutines highlighted. Is it implemented already!? if not, how we could...