Alexei

Related: #1444 (Washington Post), #804 (Wired). I'm not sure we can solve this in an automated way. Making site-specific exceptions (don't block the following domains on `wired.com` to avoid the...

We're thinking about the best approach for this internally at the EFF. Silently removing the message may not be the most effective course of action for Privacy Badger to take.

@deisi Yes! We were considering creating a call-to-action UI to make it easy for Privacy Badger users to contact the papers, and also tweeting (maybe) at the papers to point...

Hi @AramZS! We don't compile lists of domains for Privacy Badger to block; Privacy Badger learns to block by observing which domains appear to track you as you browse the...

A related thread: #1686.

>There are sites that actually do the work to turn off user tracking and they are being penalized for using particular software, which is non-optimal. Is this a continuation of...

@AramZS @dmarti Would you mind reposting some version of the above discussion as a new issue? It seems this is mostly about the merits of allowing Google Tag Manager in...

Thanks for raising this issue and thank you for your thoughtfulness! >However it's possible that individual contributors have git configured to checkout as crlf (core.autocrlf) especially in Windows, which may...

Got it, thanks! I also got a bit more context by visiting some high profile [EditorConfig users](https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig/wiki/Projects-Using-EditorConfig). Looks like having a well-configured `.gitattributes` file is best practice if your project...

One complication is that we don't want to keep rechecking DNT on blocked domains. We store last check time in the same `action_map` data structure. Discarding (never storing) non-tracking subdomains...