whisper.cpp
whisper.cpp copied to clipboard
Published
20 hours ago •
ggerganov
ggerganov
Last segment is repeated in output after the end of input
I have a file which according to ffprobe is 6m59.53s. The end of the output looks like this:
[00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:47.840] In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders' rights, such an action would be a violation
[00:06:47.840 --> 00:06:54.120] of the consumer's rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information
[00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:56.760] in their possession.
[00:06:56.760 --> 00:06:57.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:57.760 --> 00:06:58.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:58.760 --> 00:06:59.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:59.760 --> 00:07:00.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:00.760 --> 00:07:01.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:02.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:02.760 --> 00:07:03.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:03.760 --> 00:07:04.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:04.760 --> 00:07:05.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:05.760 --> 00:07:06.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:06.760 --> 00:07:07.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:07.760 --> 00:07:08.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:08.760 --> 00:07:09.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:09.760 --> 00:07:10.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:10.760 --> 00:07:11.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:11.760 --> 00:07:12.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:12.760 --> 00:07:13.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:13.760 --> 00:07:14.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:14.760 --> 00:07:15.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:15.760 --> 00:07:16.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:16.760 --> 00:07:17.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:17.760 --> 00:07:18.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:18.760 --> 00:07:19.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:19.760 --> 00:07:20.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:20.760 --> 00:07:21.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:21.760 --> 00:07:22.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:22.760 --> 00:07:23.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:23.760 --> 00:07:24.760] End of appendix C.
The recording ends with "End of appendix C." In the output, however, it continues repeating this line past the input length, and each repeat shows 1 second elapsed.
The command I used is whisper --output-vtt -m /opt/whisper/ggml-base.bin ./apc.mp3.wav. Here is the complete output:
whisper_model_load: loading model from '/opt/whisper/ggml-base.bin'
whisper_model_load: n_vocab = 51865
whisper_model_load: n_audio_ctx = 1500
whisper_model_load: n_audio_state = 512
whisper_model_load: n_audio_head = 8
whisper_model_load: n_audio_layer = 6
whisper_model_load: n_text_ctx = 448
whisper_model_load: n_text_state = 512
whisper_model_load: n_text_head = 8
whisper_model_load: n_text_layer = 6
whisper_model_load: n_mels = 80
whisper_model_load: f16 = 1
whisper_model_load: type = 2
whisper_model_load: adding 1608 extra tokens
whisper_model_load: mem_required = 506.00 MB
whisper_model_load: ggml ctx size = 140.60 MB
whisper_model_load: memory size = 22.83 MB
whisper_model_load: model size = 140.54 MB
system_info: n_threads = 4 / 5 | AVX = 0 | AVX2 = 0 | AVX512 = 0 | NEON = 1 | F16C = 0 | FP16_VA = 0 | WASM_SIMD = 0 | BLAS = 0 |
main: processing './apc.mp3.wav' (6711682 samples, 419.5 sec), 4 threads, 1 processors, lang = en, task = transcribe, timestamps = 1 ...
[00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.080] The Dorian Principle, a biblical response to the commercialization of Christianity by
[00:00:07.080 --> 00:00:14.320] Conley Owens, Appendix C, Copyright and Natural Law.
[00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:20.080] In Chapter 13, I argued that the Dorian Principle should lead ministers to forego legal enforcement
[00:00:20.080 --> 00:00:23.800] of copyright protections in the context of ministry.
[00:00:23.800 --> 00:00:29.240] However, there is a stronger case to be made that all Christians should waive such protections
[00:00:29.240 --> 00:00:31.720] in all contexts.
[00:00:31.720 --> 00:00:36.240] While theologians differ on the matter, I would argue that a biblical view of natural
[00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:41.040] law delegitimizes the entire notion of intellectual property.
[00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:46.360] First, it should be recognized that copyright laws and artificial imposition on the economy
[00:00:46.360 --> 00:00:52.880] of creative works, and the words of Christopher May and Susan K. Celle, intellectual property
[00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:59.080] constructs a scarce resource from knowledge or information that is not formally scarce.
[00:00:59.080 --> 00:01:04.920] Ideas are inherently reproducible, and in an additional age, the cost of reproducing
[00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:06.960] most works is negligible.
[00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:11.960] However, copyright protection maintains an economy around the selling and buying of
[00:01:11.960 --> 00:01:16.840] licenses to obtain copies of creative works and the rights to use them.
[00:01:16.840 --> 00:01:22.600] Beyond this initial observation, the relatively recent advent of copyright regulations demonstrates
[00:01:22.600 --> 00:01:26.000] their nature as purely human inventions.
[00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:31.280] If they were instead codifications of a divine principle, one would expect such statutes
[00:01:31.280 --> 00:01:34.320] to appear earlier in human history.
[00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:41.040] Additionally, while most relevant laws protect material property to perpetuity, the copyright
[00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:47.360] protection offered by governments is, in all but a few circumstances, temporary.
[00:01:47.360 --> 00:01:51.880] This constitutes an implicit concession that intellectual property is not property in
[00:01:51.880 --> 00:01:54.040] the truest sense.
[00:01:54.040 --> 00:01:58.960] The fact that some of these protections last for 20 years and some longer than a lifetime
[00:01:58.960 --> 00:02:03.680] testified to the arbitrary nature of intellectual property law.
[00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.600] Of course, not all would agree.
[00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:11.480] Some have argued that copyright protection stems from natural rights, those rights given
[00:02:11.480 --> 00:02:12.880] by God.
[00:02:12.880 --> 00:02:17.840] In fact, the founding fathers of the United States incorporated provision for intellectual
[00:02:17.840 --> 00:02:22.680] property law and the Constitution on the basis of a lock-yam understanding of natural
[00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:24.240] rights.
[00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:29.040] If one has a right to liberty and property, the body being irrevocably the property of
[00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:34.800] the individual, then he has a right to the products of his body, the fruit of his labors.
[00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:39.840] Moreover, one who goes about the improvement of nature ought to be able to reap the rewards
[00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:41.880] of that improvement.
[00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:46.800] Following this line of reasoning, one may conclude that no categorical difference exists between
[00:02:46.800 --> 00:02:50.280] intellectual property and material property.
[00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:56.760] One who fashions a creative work ought to have ownership over it as his own property.
[00:02:56.760 --> 00:03:02.200] While these lock-yam premises are unobjectionable, the conclusion must be questioned.
[00:03:02.200 --> 00:03:07.800] To protect the product of the mind is not the right to hold a secret sufficient.
[00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:12.520] One who is not compelled to divulge information or share property may keep his creative works
[00:03:12.520 --> 00:03:13.840] to himself.
[00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:20.240] However, once disseminated, he has freely given this information to the public.
[00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:25.880] With material property, a violation of the eighth commandment, they shall not steal, results
[00:03:25.880 --> 00:03:28.680] in direct loss for another individual.
[00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:33.960] With intellectual property, undesired copying and use of a published work may only be counted
[00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:38.920] as a loss when estimating the potential of an idea to garner profit.
[00:03:38.920 --> 00:03:44.480] In the words of Thomas Jefferson, "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible
[00:03:44.480 --> 00:03:49.560] than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called
[00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:56.000] an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself."
[00:03:56.000 --> 00:04:01.560] But the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the
[00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:05.000] receiver cannot dispossess himself of it.
[00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:10.400] Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less because every other possesses
[00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:12.080] the whole of it.
[00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:18.320] He who receives an idea from me receives instruction himself without lessening mind, as he who
[00:04:18.320 --> 00:04:23.000] lights his taper at mind, receives light without darkening me.
[00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:27.440] That idea should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and
[00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:33.880] mutual instruction of man and improvement of his condition seems to have been peculiarly
[00:04:33.880 --> 00:04:40.120] and benevolently designed by nature when she made them like fire, expandable over all
[00:04:40.120 --> 00:04:46.160] space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe,
[00:04:46.160 --> 00:04:55.200] move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.
[00:04:55.200 --> 00:04:59.880] In my estimation, the language employed in copyright legislation betrays the underlying
[00:04:59.880 --> 00:05:02.280] utilitarian motives.
[00:05:02.280 --> 00:05:07.240] The US Constitution gives Congress the power to promote the progress of science and useful
[00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:12.960] arts by securing for limited times to authors and investors the exclusive right to their respected
[00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:15.880] writings and discoveries.
[00:05:15.880 --> 00:05:20.340] The statute of an established copyright law for preventing the detriment of authors and
[00:05:20.340 --> 00:05:26.440] proprietors for the future and for the encouragement of learned men to compose and write useful
[00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:28.920] books.
[00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:33.840] Rather than flowing from natural rights endowed by our creator, copyright law arises from
[00:05:33.840 --> 00:05:39.040] a pragmatic desire to model the economy of creative works after the economy of physical
[00:05:39.040 --> 00:05:42.600] goods.
[00:05:42.600 --> 00:05:46.440] If it can be granted that the government has a sweeping authority to wield its power to
[00:05:46.440 --> 00:05:52.120] improve the lives of its subjects, modern copyright may have some place in society.
[00:05:52.120 --> 00:05:56.720] If instead the God-ordained authority of the civil magistrate is limited to the enforcement
[00:05:56.720 --> 00:06:01.880] of retributive justice, the government may only prosecute those who have violated the natural
[00:06:01.880 --> 00:06:03.840] rights of another.
[00:06:03.840 --> 00:06:10.560] In this view, Lex Talley-Hannes, Exist 2124, combined with the Deuteronomic principle
[00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:17.200] that justice shall not be perverted by other paragogatives due to the Deuteronomy 1617-20,
[00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:22.240] restricts governing authorities from erecting legislation extraneous to the violation of
[00:06:22.240 --> 00:06:25.640] one's property rights.
[00:06:25.640 --> 00:06:30.280] If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of
[00:06:30.280 --> 00:06:31.560] government.
[00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:37.000] If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use
[00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:41.360] the power of government in a court of law to enforce copyright.
[00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:47.840] In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders' rights, such an action would be a violation
[00:06:47.840 --> 00:06:54.120] of the consumer's rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information
[00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:56.760] in their possession.
[00:06:56.760 --> 00:06:57.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:57.760 --> 00:06:58.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:58.760 --> 00:06:59.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:59.760 --> 00:07:00.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:00.760 --> 00:07:01.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:02.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:02.760 --> 00:07:03.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:03.760 --> 00:07:04.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:04.760 --> 00:07:05.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:05.760 --> 00:07:06.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:06.760 --> 00:07:07.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:07.760 --> 00:07:08.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:08.760 --> 00:07:09.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:09.760 --> 00:07:10.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:10.760 --> 00:07:11.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:11.760 --> 00:07:12.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:12.760 --> 00:07:13.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:13.760 --> 00:07:14.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:14.760 --> 00:07:15.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:15.760 --> 00:07:16.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:16.760 --> 00:07:17.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:17.760 --> 00:07:18.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:18.760 --> 00:07:19.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:19.760 --> 00:07:20.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:20.760 --> 00:07:21.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:21.760 --> 00:07:22.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:22.760 --> 00:07:23.760] End of appendix C.
[00:07:23.760 --> 00:07:24.760] End of appendix C.
output_vtt: saving output to './apc.mp3.wav.vtt'
whisper_print_timings: load time = 2944.41 ms
whisper_print_timings: mel time = 1450.38 ms
whisper_print_timings: sample time = 178.93 ms
whisper_print_timings: encode time = 20019.51 ms / 3336.58 ms per layer
whisper_print_timings: decode time = 16106.12 ms / 2684.35 ms per layer
whisper_print_timings: total time = 41724.77 ms
Here is apc.mp3.wav.tar.gz (archived so Github will accept it, the original audio file is licensed as CC0 aka public domain).
I've seen this when playing around with audio_ctx. If you make it too small in relation to your length you get repeats.
@ggerganov it indeed works a lot better now, thank you!
whisper_model_load: loading model from '/opt/whisper/ggml-base.bin'
whisper_model_load: n_vocab = 51865
whisper_model_load: n_audio_ctx = 1500
whisper_model_load: n_audio_state = 512
whisper_model_load: n_audio_head = 8
whisper_model_load: n_audio_layer = 6
whisper_model_load: n_text_ctx = 448
whisper_model_load: n_text_state = 512
whisper_model_load: n_text_head = 8
whisper_model_load: n_text_layer = 6
whisper_model_load: n_mels = 80
whisper_model_load: f16 = 1
whisper_model_load: type = 2
whisper_model_load: adding 1608 extra tokens
whisper_model_load: mem_required = 506.00 MB
whisper_model_load: ggml ctx size = 140.60 MB
whisper_model_load: memory size = 22.83 MB
whisper_model_load: model size = 140.54 MB
system_info: n_threads = 4 / 5 | AVX = 0 | AVX2 = 0 | AVX512 = 0 | NEON = 1 | F16C = 0 | FP16_VA = 0 | WASM_SIMD = 0 | BLAS = 0 |
main: processing './apc.mp3.wav' (6711682 samples, 419.5 sec), 4 threads, 1 processors, lang = en, task = transcribe, timestamps = 1 ...
[00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.080] The Dorian Principle, a biblical response to the commercialization of Christianity by
[00:00:07.080 --> 00:00:14.320] Conley Owens, Appendix C, Copyright and Natural Law.
[00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:20.080] In Chapter 13, I argued that the Dorian Principle should lead ministers to forego legal enforcement
[00:00:20.080 --> 00:00:23.800] of copyright protections in the context of ministry.
[00:00:23.800 --> 00:00:29.240] However, there is a stronger case to be made that all Christians should waive such protections
[00:00:29.240 --> 00:00:31.720] in all contexts.
[00:00:31.720 --> 00:00:36.240] While theologians differ on the matter, I would argue that a biblical view of natural
[00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:41.040] law delegitimizes the entire notion of intellectual property.
[00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:46.360] First, it should be recognized that copyright laws and artificial imposition on the economy
[00:00:46.360 --> 00:00:52.880] of creative works, and the words of Christopher May and Susan K. Celle, intellectual property
[00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:59.080] constructs a scarce resource from knowledge or information that is not formally scarce.
[00:00:59.080 --> 00:01:04.920] Ideas are inherently reproducible, and in an additional age, the cost of reproducing
[00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:06.960] most works is negligible.
[00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:11.960] However, copyright protection maintains an economy around the selling and buying of
[00:01:11.960 --> 00:01:16.840] licenses to obtain copies of creative works and the rights to use them.
[00:01:16.840 --> 00:01:22.600] Beyond this initial observation, the relatively recent advent of copyright regulations demonstrates
[00:01:22.600 --> 00:01:26.000] their nature as purely human inventions.
[00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:31.280] If they were instead codifications of a divine principle, one would expect such statutes
[00:01:31.280 --> 00:01:34.320] to appear earlier in human history.
[00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:41.040] Additionally, while most relevant laws protect material property to perpetuity, the copyright
[00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:47.360] protection offered by governments is, in all but a few circumstances, temporary.
[00:01:47.360 --> 00:01:51.880] This constitutes an implicit concession that intellectual property is not property in
[00:01:51.880 --> 00:01:54.040] the truest sense.
[00:01:54.040 --> 00:01:58.960] The fact that some of these protections last for 20 years and some longer than a lifetime
[00:01:58.960 --> 00:02:03.680] testified to the arbitrary nature of intellectual property law.
[00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.600] Of course, not all would agree.
[00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:11.480] Some have argued that copyright protection stems from natural rights, those rights given
[00:02:11.480 --> 00:02:12.880] by God.
[00:02:12.880 --> 00:02:17.840] In fact, the founding fathers of the United States incorporated provision for intellectual
[00:02:17.840 --> 00:02:22.680] property law and the Constitution on the basis of a lock-yam understanding of natural
[00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:24.240] rights.
[00:02:24.240 --> 00:02:29.040] If one has a right to liberty and property, the body being irrevocably the property of
[00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:34.800] the individual, then he has a right to the products of his body, the fruit of his labors.
[00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:39.840] Moreover, one who goes about the improvement of nature ought to be able to reap the rewards
[00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:41.880] of that improvement.
[00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:46.800] Following this line of reasoning, one may conclude that no categorical difference exists between
[00:02:46.800 --> 00:02:50.280] intellectual property and material property.
[00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:56.760] One who fashions a creative work ought to have ownership over it as his own property.
[00:02:56.760 --> 00:03:02.200] While these lock-yam premises are unobjectionable, the conclusion must be questioned.
[00:03:02.200 --> 00:03:07.800] To protect the product of the mind is not the right to hold a secret sufficient.
[00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:12.520] One who is not compelled to divulge information or share property may keep his creative works
[00:03:12.520 --> 00:03:13.840] to himself.
[00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:20.240] However, once disseminated, he has freely given this information to the public.
[00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:25.880] With material property, a violation of the eighth commandment, they shall not steal, results
[00:03:25.880 --> 00:03:28.680] in direct loss for another individual.
[00:03:28.680 --> 00:03:33.960] With intellectual property, undesired copying and use of a published work may only be counted
[00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:38.920] as a loss when estimating the potential of an idea to garner profit.
[00:03:38.920 --> 00:03:44.480] In the words of Thomas Jefferson, "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible
[00:03:44.480 --> 00:03:49.560] than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called
[00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:56.000] an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself."
[00:03:56.000 --> 00:04:01.560] But the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the
[00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:05.000] receiver cannot dispossess himself of it.
[00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:10.400] Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less because every other possesses
[00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:12.080] the whole of it.
[00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:18.320] He who receives an idea from me receives instruction himself without lessening mind, as he who
[00:04:18.320 --> 00:04:23.000] lights his taper at mind, receives light without darkening me.
[00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:27.440] That idea should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and
[00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:33.880] mutual instruction of man and improvement of his condition seems to have been peculiarly
[00:04:33.880 --> 00:04:40.120] and benevolently designed by nature when she made them like fire, expandable over all
[00:04:40.120 --> 00:04:46.160] space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe,
[00:04:46.160 --> 00:04:55.200] move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.
[00:04:55.200 --> 00:04:59.880] In my estimation, the language employed in copyright legislation betrays the underlying
[00:04:59.880 --> 00:05:02.280] utilitarian motives.
[00:05:02.280 --> 00:05:07.240] The US Constitution gives Congress the power to promote the progress of science and useful
[00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:12.960] arts by securing for limited times to authors and investors the exclusive right to their respected
[00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:15.880] writings and discoveries.
[00:05:15.880 --> 00:05:20.340] The statute of an established copyright law for preventing the detriment of authors and
[00:05:20.340 --> 00:05:26.440] proprietors for the future and for the encouragement of learned men to compose and write useful
[00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:28.920] books.
[00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:33.840] Rather than flowing from natural rights endowed by our creator, copyright law arises from
[00:05:33.840 --> 00:05:39.040] a pragmatic desire to model the economy of creative works after the economy of physical
[00:05:39.040 --> 00:05:42.600] goods.
[00:05:42.600 --> 00:05:46.440] If it can be granted that the government has a sweeping authority to wield its power to
[00:05:46.440 --> 00:05:52.120] improve the lives of its subjects, modern copyright may have some place in society.
[00:05:52.120 --> 00:05:56.720] If instead the God-ordained authority of the civil magistrate is limited to the enforcement
[00:05:56.720 --> 00:06:01.880] of retributive justice, the government may only prosecute those who have violated the natural
[00:06:01.880 --> 00:06:03.840] rights of another.
[00:06:03.840 --> 00:06:10.560] In this view, Lex Talley-Hannes, Exist 2124, combined with the Deuteronomic principle
[00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:17.200] that justice shall not be perverted by other paragogatives due to the Deuteronomy 1617-20,
[00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:22.240] restricts governing authorities from erecting legislation extraneous to the violation of
[00:06:22.240 --> 00:06:25.640] one's property rights.
[00:06:25.640 --> 00:06:30.280] If copyright is not a natural right, then its protection is not a legitimate function of
[00:06:30.280 --> 00:06:31.560] government.
[00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:37.000] If copyright is not a natural right, then it is unethical for any man or ministry to use
[00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:41.360] the power of government in a court of law to enforce copyright.
[00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:47.840] In fact, rather than a protection of the copyright holders' rights, such an action would be a violation
[00:06:47.840 --> 00:06:54.120] of the consumer's rights, as they ought to be able to do as they please with the information
[00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:56.760] in their possession.
[00:06:56.760 --> 00:06:57.760] End of appendix C.
[00:06:57.760 --> 00:07:07.760] [Music]
output_vtt: saving output to './apc.mp3.wav.vtt'
whisper_print_timings: load time = 1101.72 ms
whisper_print_timings: mel time = 1370.93 ms
whisper_print_timings: sample time = 161.49 ms
whisper_print_timings: encode time = 20721.41 ms / 3453.57 ms per layer
whisper_print_timings: decode time = 15660.57 ms / 2610.10 ms per layer
whisper_print_timings: total time = 40315.25 ms
One oddity is that it says [Music] now (there is no music, and the timestamp still goes beyond the end of the file), but I'll take that over repeated output.