Peter Ferenczy

@gentcys I believe this can be closed, as the issue is with the package, not nix-darwin. The error messages are indeed confusing, but that has been fixed in nixpkgs -...

Please merge and release this finally @evancz. The PR has been open for 5 and a half years now and people will keep wasting their time debugging unless a fix...

can't we just patch zsh to use different rcfile paths? users can then set the patched zsh as their shell with nix-darwin

+1 would love to have this feature, a team I'm involved in would like to conduct multi-select polls. Would this only be available in the web client if merged?

@flokli you might want to know about this as the maintainer of nsncd as the new default nameserver daemon in NixOS

@flokli good suggestion. Just checked and it returns almost exactly the same response upon receiving the "Additional" response, only with a single bit difference to nsncd's output: This actually ends...

I also wonder whether it would make sense for nsncd to look into the ADDITIONAL section - to me it looks like it wouldn't hurt. In my case the verbatim...

The same issue pops up for more people: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/occasional-dns-problems/35824 https://discourse.nixos.org/t/something-is-footgunning-around-dns-lookups/41368/4 These both seem like the exact same issue: answer is in ADDITIONAL section and nsncd doesn't parse it. I have...

I have the distinct suspicion that this DNS server behavior might be somewhat contrary to DNS [spec](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1035), because it says: > The additional records section contains RRs which relate to...

Thanks @Velin92 for rectifying this. Dismissing and dowplaying severe issues is not the way to handle them. This issue popped up today on the latest version of the iOS app.