Filippo Gentile

Last commit is a fix unrelated to this PR but found when testing. Also currently you cannot really test this PR in simulation mode because IO handler will not reply...

@reinder What do you think about this?

> > Also currently you cannot really test this PR in simulation mode because IO handler will not reply to locomotive drive messages, this is detected as UDP packet drop...

The problem is that reply is always a `LAN_X_LOCO_INFO` which contains all loco state. So if we rely to decoder throttle change we need to put in also functions state...

Proof of concept. Not tested yet

You can merge it!

Active trains seems no to be deleted when removed from Train list. This may be because vehicles hold a reference to them. We should not allow deleting an active Train,...

> And what about a train that is assigned to a block, does deactivating remove it, or must is be removed form the block(s) first? It would be correct and...

Problem with this is that the check is done at client side and some other client can delete Train while dialog is open

Hi. I think error messages now conflict with PR #115