Guilhem Fanton
Guilhem Fanton
@moul I've discussed with @jefft0 and I agree we can include those flags in gnodev as it doesn't cost much yet. I just want to avoid duplicating a lot of...
@moul For now, the only constraint is to create a Go test file that will run `testscript` with a target directory, which can be any directory (current directory or `testdata`)....
@thehowl we can close it, it have been replaced by #2652
Amazing! I've made some additional modifications to `gnodev` locally, and I can confirm that this PR correctly fixes the timestamp issue. I also managed to get `Reload`, `Reset`, `Export`, and...
@thanhngoc541 your framework in #2947 looks pretty cool, but unfortunately, we are not looking for an HTML framework. As gnoweb **should not** support HTML syntax at some point (and i...
As mentioned in #2976: > I'm wondering if it would be better to have those libraries either in the user namespace or in a dedicated directory until a good one...
I don't think we actually lost coverage. I believe the reason why the `gnovm` flag coverage is decreasing by 20% is because enabling coverage on `txtar` also generates coverage for...
@ajnavarro An idea to avoid having `gnovm` flags "corrupted" by `txtar` coverage, is to put `txtar` coverage under its own flag, such as `gnovm/txtar`.
@ajnavarro should be good now
i've added filtering by module so it doesn't expand coverage on multiple tags