Expose `HybridSDK` from `Sentry` framework

[denrase]

:scroll: Description

We want to support SPM in our sentry flutter framework. In order to do this, we need the SentryHybridSDK classes, which we expose though Cocoapods, to also be available in our SPM package.

This PR adds an explicit module with the hybrid headers, except "SentryEnvelope.h".

:bulb: Motivation and Context

Unblocks https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-dart/pull/2280

:green_heart: How did you test it?

:pencil: Checklist

You have to check all boxes before merging:

• [x] I reviewed the submitted code.
• [ ] I added tests to verify the changes.
• [ ] No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• [ ] I updated the docs if needed.
• [ ] Review from the native team if needed.
• [x] No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• [x] No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

[github-actions[bot]]

	Messages
:book:	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against a4bca184fe361f89315f7fdd2b16a31413e17ba4

[github-actions[bot]]

Performance metrics :rocket:

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1229.77 ms	1255.90 ms	26.13 ms
Size	22.30 KiB	730.75 KiB	708.45 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
879fb28ba31f00157b8728013941870f4f0f4f6c	1243.18 ms	1255.98 ms	12.80 ms
98752f38221b7244ce958ab08fc00908ba3de694	1226.18 ms	1251.38 ms	25.20 ms
e0904ef6b8b510e9739820aa29379b074b26e237	1231.85 ms	1252.38 ms	20.53 ms
3f6c30b04dc2377110490170c382b92ae85ee9a6	1252.98 ms	1266.22 ms	13.24 ms
26530fec80489397091f307088e6a03644cf5efd	1233.98 ms	1250.06 ms	16.08 ms
742d4b693cfd3cf2b7b1d62930d16daaf505d367	1196.56 ms	1216.54 ms	19.98 ms
8b1c6a90b399ed69ca52a3b97802c5667ee8153c	1216.92 ms	1230.90 ms	13.98 ms
643853e695fb398478c6af8c0c060b8fde9b3744	1225.75 ms	1247.00 ms	21.25 ms
8e76be4558a9e15fe63841bbb98faec7d921f24e	1272.67 ms	1286.38 ms	13.71 ms
dacf894bd3ce125f76ea565dbc543db3da8bf94d	1223.96 ms	1250.41 ms	26.45 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
879fb28ba31f00157b8728013941870f4f0f4f6c	22.84 KiB	402.88 KiB	380.03 KiB
98752f38221b7244ce958ab08fc00908ba3de694	20.76 KiB	435.09 KiB	414.33 KiB
e0904ef6b8b510e9739820aa29379b074b26e237	21.58 KiB	614.64 KiB	593.06 KiB
3f6c30b04dc2377110490170c382b92ae85ee9a6	22.85 KiB	408.88 KiB	386.03 KiB
26530fec80489397091f307088e6a03644cf5efd	21.58 KiB	714.93 KiB	693.35 KiB
742d4b693cfd3cf2b7b1d62930d16daaf505d367	21.58 KiB	546.20 KiB	524.62 KiB
8b1c6a90b399ed69ca52a3b97802c5667ee8153c	21.58 KiB	706.97 KiB	685.38 KiB
643853e695fb398478c6af8c0c060b8fde9b3744	21.58 KiB	655.73 KiB	634.15 KiB
8e76be4558a9e15fe63841bbb98faec7d921f24e	20.76 KiB	427.66 KiB	406.89 KiB
dacf894bd3ce125f76ea565dbc543db3da8bf94d	20.76 KiB	426.34 KiB	405.58 KiB

Previous results on branch: feat/hybrid-sdk-private-modulemap

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
3dc0c00e86a8aea6d3407511a5098e4e5042dcbb	1235.20 ms	1250.67 ms	15.47 ms
6b9410696a320fcf8e72c3adc1de8fb334b5c5ae	1232.12 ms	1253.14 ms	21.02 ms
440380a6298b1ce30a2a39891ba2e7e649076744	1233.94 ms	1251.60 ms	17.66 ms
5ddaad1d40a60a83a6bae2e3482d1c0d5d7a9535	1234.75 ms	1252.96 ms	18.21 ms
25f6d46a5ec5ce42fb0eac65c357b6a16b5d4681	1238.86 ms	1258.98 ms	20.12 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
3dc0c00e86a8aea6d3407511a5098e4e5042dcbb	21.90 KiB	726.90 KiB	705.00 KiB
6b9410696a320fcf8e72c3adc1de8fb334b5c5ae	21.90 KiB	726.89 KiB	704.99 KiB
440380a6298b1ce30a2a39891ba2e7e649076744	21.90 KiB	708.33 KiB	686.43 KiB
5ddaad1d40a60a83a6bae2e3482d1c0d5d7a9535	21.90 KiB	730.10 KiB	708.20 KiB
25f6d46a5ec5ce42fb0eac65c357b6a16b5d4681	22.30 KiB	730.10 KiB	707.80 KiB

[denrase]

@philipphofmann Maybe it's enough to mark the headers in question as package private, wdyt?

[brustolin]

We will need a test workflow of sample using PrivateSentrySDKOnly from Swift, so we make sure to not break it.

[denrase]

Closed in favor of https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-cocoa/pull/4486

[denrase]

@brustolin @philipphofmann Turns our we do need the explicit module after all to import the needed files in Flutter when integrating through SPM. Therefore i reopened this PR.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 91.575%. Comparing base (d9f518a) to head (a4bca18). Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              main     #4440       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage   91.566%   91.575%   +0.008%     
=============================================
  Files          615       615               
  Lines        69701     69689       -12     
  Branches     24967     24957       -10     
=============================================
- Hits         63823     63818        -5     
+ Misses        5787      5779        -8     
- Partials        91        92        +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...tions/SessionReplay/SentrySessionReplayTests.swift	98.870% <100.000%> (ø)

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update d9f518a...a4bca18. Read the comment docs.