Flatpak releases for Linux

[fonnesbeck]

It would be helpful to have alternative formats for Linux releases, notably including Flatpak. Depending on the distro being used, Appimage is not always easy to use.

[elyxlz]

bump, arm builds too please!

[rohaanmalik]

Bump, love the product. please add Flatpak release

[glima31]

bump, please add this

[piotrowskiadam]

Yes, flatpak published on flathub would be best or at least packages for most popular distros .deb , .rpm

[RobLW]

+1.

[pugaizai]

~i create a flatpak for cursor https://github.com/pugaizai/flatpak/tree/main/manifests/com.cursor.cursor~

~feel free to submit to flathub~

dropped

[rafael-wolf-cbh]

up

[proletarius101]

I've submitted a PR: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/6566

[DevopsGoth]

I've submitted a PR: flathub/flathub#6566

It seems the flatpak maintainers would prefer this flatpak being submitted by the cursor maintainers and not a helpful third party, per the cited: Submissions incompatible or restricted by Flatpak sandbox: ... such as development tools and IDEs ... Unless these applications are being officially submitted by the upstream developers and/or upstream has explicitly committed to supporting Flatpak they will not be accepted.

Perhaps if Cursor devs weigh in on the matter over there it would help. Flatpaks tend to work well, I'm having issues with the AppImage shipped version so I was hoping for a Flatpak of this.

[mohssineAboutaj]

this is so bad, how much we need to wait tell the Cursor team give us a Flatpak version or any other format then .Appimage are they even care about this issue?

[sepsol]

bump

[MoralCode]

possibly a duplicate of #846