Framework should only contain Redacted API Keys, and not the functionality

[kunalverma25]

The MailGun, TinyURL etc functionality is also inside the framework, So developers cannot extend and/or change that functionality. Which kinda diminishes the whole purpose of open-sourcing. Personally I think, only the keys should be redacted and not the functionality, so if some dev wants to extend the functionality, they can do so easily.

[vineetchoudhary]

Hi, that doesn't make any sense because anyone can access those keys and misuse them.

I only added very limited functionality in the private framework. Before this, all these things were open source but some user doesn't want to create the key for mailgun and branch.io app to run the AppBox from source code. So, that's why created that private framework.

I'm thinking a different way, I'll open source that private framework without any key. Where user can rebuild that framework with their own key.

[kunalverma25]

Yeah.. Maybe a different branch, without the keys?

[kunalverma25]

@vineetchoudhary Any estimated when, you'll be able to add this? Basically a way to add own keys/config for Dropbox, MailGun, Tiny etc.. Btw.. Thanks for such an awesome project!

[vineetchoudhary]

Hi, I can't promise. But I'll surely work on it. I already have a few things to plan for this.

• Shared variables for Fastlane plugin
• iOS SDK
• Xamarin SDK
• Manual Signing

After these, I'll work on this.