Write custom, more succinct, debug output for all geometries in geo-types

[michaelkirk]

Currently we're just using the derived Debug, which is pretty noisy. Especially for our compound structures, having a denser representation can make debugging easier.

e.g.

Coordinate

This one's maybe fine as is?

let coord = Coordinate {x:  1.0, y: 2.0};
println!("coord: {:?}", &coord);

> coord: Coordinate { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }

Point

But elsewhere, "Coordinate" isn't adding anything in my opinion:

let point = Point::from(coord);
println!("point: {:?}", &point);

> point: Point(Coordinate { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 })

Maybe something like: Point( x: 1.0, y: 2.0) would be better?

Line

let line = Line::new(coord, coord);
println!("line: {:?}", &line);

> line: Line { start: Coordinate { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }, end: Coordinate { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 } }

Maybe something like: Line[(x: 1.0, y: 2.0) -> (x: 3.0, y: 4.0)] would be better?

MultiPoint

let multi_point = MultiPoint(vec![point, point, point]);
println!("multi_point: {:?}", &multi_point);

> multi_point: MultiPoint([Point(Coordinate { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }), Point(Coordinate { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 }), Point(Coordinate { x: 5.0, y: 6.0 })])

Maybe something like: MultiPoint[(x: 1.0, y: 2.0), (x: 3.0, y: 4.0), (x: 5.0, y: 6.0)] would be better?

etc

This isn't intended to be a comprehensive spec - just trying to exemplify what I think is valuable - putting some thought into the specifics for each type will be some work.

[michaelkirk]

lol am I just re-inventing WKT?

[frewsxcv]

This all sounds good to me! 👍🏻