George

> I would like to work on this issue! Excellent. I am going to start on `QueryJoinPool` and `QueryExitPool` today.

> @georgemc98 I want to clarify one thing about the second query. Currently it works by equally splitting shares among all tokens in pool and then returns respectful amount of...

> @georgemc98 I want to clarify one thing about the second query. Currently it works by equally splitting shares among all tokens in pool and then returns respectful amount of...

> > > @georgemc98 I want to clarify one thing about the second query. Currently it works by equally splitting shares among all tokens in pool and then returns respectful...

> @georgemc98 I fixed some things right now but not finished. basically what is left is to finish with tests. If you decide to work on this issue please feel...

> > > @georgemc98 I fixed some things right now but not finished. basically what is left is to finish with tests. If you decide to work on this issue...

> > @p0mvn @alexanderbez what is the process to determine whether these queries can be added to the stargate whitelist or not? > > > > AFAIK, they have to...

@alexanderbez @RusAkh I'm seeing there is a merge conflict now in the `x/gamm/types/errors.go` file. Would you like me to resolve it, or will the Osmosis team fix it?

> Can you resolve the conflicts? Yes, happy to.

> > @alexanderbez @p0mvn Should whitelisting of these queries be done in this PR or do we need to create a separate PR for that? Have you guys reviewed the...